Legal Opinion
United States v. Fikri Soussi
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1994No. 93-1038PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s suppression order brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731. The government contends that the court (1) erroneously amended the search warrant’s date restriction; and (2) improperly excluded evidence seized under the plain view doctrine. We conclude that the original date restriction in the search warrant was supported by probable cause and that the court’s plain view doctrine analysis was in error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. BACKGROUND
This action arose from the government’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Ken Ramirez, Peter Hotchkiss, Paul Hotchkiss, and Patrick FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Mark Edwin SellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Cassady v. GoeringCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.