Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Edwin Sells

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 19, 2006No. 04-5167PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Under the severability doctrine, “[t]he infirmity of part of a warrant requires the suppression of evidence seized pursuant to that part of the warrant, but does not require the suppression of anything described in the valid portions of the warrant (or lawfully seized — on plain view grounds, for example — during ... execution [of the valid portions]).” United, States v. Brown, 984 F.2d 1074, 1077 (10th Cir.1993) (quotations, alteration omitted). We adopted the doctrine in Brown, and more fully addressed it in United States v. Naugle, 997 F.2d 819, 822-23 (10th Cir.1993);…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Nathaniel Brent v. Wayne Cty. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. LebowitzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. GalpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Cassady v. GoeringCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API