Legal Opinion
Cassady v. Goering
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 28, 2009No. 07-1092PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Thomas J. Cassady brought this § 1983 action against Steven E. Goering. Mr. Cassady alleged Sheriff Goering violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. A jury found for Mr. Cassady at the first trial, but he was awarded a new trial due to a prejudicially low damages award. Sheriff Goering filed a Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Renewed Motion Based on Qualified Im*632munity. He appeals the district court’s amended order rejecting his qualified immunity claim. Because the warrant permits a general search and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Mink v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Rutha Carroll v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. GalpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Bowling v. RectorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Ysasi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.