Legal Opinion

United States v. Cameron

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 30, 1936No. 10710PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

The appeal of the government presents the question whether there was substantial evidence to sustain the verdict returned by the jury finding that Winston Arthur Cameron was totally and permanently disabled on or prior to May 11, 1920, within the meaning of his war risk insurance.

Cameron is a veteran of the World War, and the insurance was issued to him in the amount of $10,000 while he was in the service as a second class seaman. On the trial of this suit to recover the insurance, the trial court instructed the jury that the insurance had been kept in force because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. RentfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. StackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. RakichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API