Legal Opinion
Eggen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1932No. 9343PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the Government in a war risk insurance ease. Emil Eggen was the insured. He was in the army from May 19, 1917, to August 24,1919, saw active service, but received no wounds. His enlistment record shows his condition to have been good at the time of his discharge. His own declaration, the certificate of his commanding officer and that of the medical officer who examined him are to the effect that he then had no disease or disability. He paid no premiums upon his policy after his separation from the service, and, by its terms,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Garrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Cupples Co. Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Svenson v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.