Legal Opinion

United States v. Stack

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1933No. 3395PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment on a policy of war risk insurance which lapsed for nonpayment of premiums in the year 1919. Insured died of tuberculosis in the year 1925. The only question is whether insured was totally and permanently disabled at the time of the lapse of the policy, and the majority of the court are of opinion that, under the principles laid down in U. S. v. Diehl (C. C. A. 4th) 62 F.(2d) 343, and Eggen v. U. S. (C. C. A. 8th) 58 F.(2d) 616, 620, the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the conclusion that he was disabled at that time. We think that there is evidence that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  4. Hirt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Mikell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  5. Prevette v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API