Legal Opinion
People v. Roth
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 1981PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Defendants, all of whom are licensed physicians, were indicted under the Donnelly Act, which prohibits “combination [s] whereby * * * [c] ompetition or the free exercise of any activity in the conduct of any business, trade or commerce or in the furnishing of any service * * * is or may *447be restrained” (General Business Law, § 340). Specifically, it was alleged that defendants had violated this statute by organizing a group boycott and concertedly refusing to furnish professional services to nonemergency workers’ compensation and no-fault insurance patients. The boycott was…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
4Cited by14 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ingraham v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Mahmud v. KaufmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Deshpande v. TJH Medical Services, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Purgess v. SharrockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.