Legal Opinion
Purgess v. Sharrock
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 29, 1992No. 91 Civ. 621 (LJF)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREEH, District Judge.
Prior to trial, plaintiff Jan Purgess (“Purgess”) moved in limine to exclude evidence regarding any of his cases which were not identified at the time of his discharge from The Hospital for Special Surgery (“HSS”). 1 Defendants Nigel Shar-rock (“Sharrock”) and HSS opposed that motion and, pursuant to Court instruction, included in their trial memorandum of law all claims for summary judgment. Also pursuant to Court instruction, Purgess included his opposition to the motion for summary judgment in his trial memorandum. For the reasons stated on the record on October 19,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bernstein v. MiskDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- FD Property Holding, Inc. v. US Traffic Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Mahmud v. KaufmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Ginzburg v. Memorial Healthcare Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Kolari v. New York-Presbyterian HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.