Legal Opinion

Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 5, 1973No. Civ. A. 75-72-APublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Jr., District Judge.

This is a class action brought under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, for injunctive relief and damages as allowed by 15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 26. The agreement allegedly restraining trade or commerce is a minimum fee schedule adopted by the defendant Fairfax Bar Association, consistent violations of which may subject an attorney to disciplinary measures initiated by committees of the defendant Virginia State Bar. 1 .

' The matter came on for hearing, on the issue of liability only, on December 13, 1972.

The Court adopts as part of its findings of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. City of Lafayette, Louisiana, and City of Plaquemine, Louisiana v. Lousiana Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Pontius v. Children's HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API