Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
In this appeal based solely on the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company [hereinafter Farm Bureau] contends that the Court of Appeals erred (1) in determining that plaintiff is entitled to stack the underinsured motorist [hereinafter UIM] coverage in the policy issued to the named plaintiff (the Proctor policy) with the UIM coverage in the policy issued to Country Manor Antiques (inter-policy stacking); and, (2) in determining that plaintiff is entitled *535to stack the UIM coverages on the three vehicles insured in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Lanning v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Nesbit v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995