Legal Opinion

Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1989No. 384A88PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The sole question presented by this appeal is what amount of underinsured motorist coverage is required by law when an insurer has not complied with N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21(b)(4) and the liability insurance policy in which the underinsured motorist coverage is required does not state the existence or the amount of such coverage. The trial court and the majority in the Court of Appeals concluded that under such circumstances the statute, as *222it was written at the time relevant to this case,1 required underinsured motorist coverage equal to the maximum liability coverage provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Hendrickson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API