Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Lankford
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action, defendants-appellants (defendants) argue the trial court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide), thereby effectively barring defendants Steve and Linda Lankford (Mr. and Mrs. Lankford, the parents) and their son, defendant Walter Scott Lankford (Scott), from raising any claims for uninsured motorists (UM) coverage under the parents’ insurance policy with Nationwide. We agree the parents were erroneously denied coverage by the court’s ruling.
Pertinent factual and procedural…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bolkhir v. North Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Crowder v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Flippin v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haynes v NeshewatMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Haynes v NeshewatMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Lawn Etc., LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023