Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Lankford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1995No. 9310SC1143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

In this declaratory judgment action, defendants-appellants (defendants) argue the trial court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide), thereby effectively barring defendants Steve and Linda Lankford (Mr. and Mrs. Lankford, the parents) and their son, defendant Walter Scott Lankford (Scott), from raising any claims for uninsured motorists (UM) coverage under the parents’ insurance policy with Nationwide. We agree the parents were erroneously denied coverage by the court’s ruling.

Pertinent factual and procedural…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bolkhir v. North Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Crowder v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Flippin v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haynes v NeshewatMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Haynes v NeshewatMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Lawn Etc., LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API