Legal Opinion

Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1992No. 917SC714PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Defendant North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (“Farm Bureau”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for plaintiff which determined plaintiff was entitled to engage in both interpolicy and intrapolicy stacking of underin-sured motorist (“UIM”) coverage. Defendant argues the trial court improperly ordered stacking of the policies in the present case because the accident in question occurred prior to an amendment to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4) which now imposes an insurance stacking requirement. We disagree with defendant’s contentions and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Sproles v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Sproles v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Wiggins v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API