Legal Opinion
Mullis v. Mullis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 13, 1983No. 55349PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Justice.
Arising under the auspices of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), this case of first impression presents two distinct issues. First, did the trial court retain jurisdiction over the former husband’s Motion to Reduce Alimony after the former wife voluntarily dismissed her action to enforce the Alabama court’s order awarding her periodic alimony? If so, did the evidence support the trial court’s termination of the alimony?
On January 26, 1977, Katherine and C. Howell Mullís were divorced by final decree of the Circuit Court for Tuscaloosa County, Alabama.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Davidson v. DavidsonWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Marriage of PopenhagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Byrne v. ByrneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Professional Credit Collections, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Quigley v. QuigleySupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Pavlovich v. PavlovichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Winkler v. Solutions Group, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.