Professional Credit Collections, Inc. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OP ALA, Justice.
We are asked to decide if, after a defendant’s success in vacating a default judgment against her, the plaintiff may — by voluntarily dismissing her as a party defendant in the action on an open account — avoid liability for her pre-dismissal attorney’s fees. We answer in the negative.
Professional Credit Collections, Inc. (PCC), as collection agent for a dentist, sued a formerly-married couple (David and Debbie Smith) to recover on an open account. When neither could be served personally, PCC resorted to service by publication and secured a default judgment. Mrs. Smith’s wages…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Parker v. MatthewsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Thayer v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Payne v. DewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Hastings v. KelleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Batman v. Metro Petroleum, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- AUSTIN PLACE, L.L.C. v. MARTSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.