Legal Opinion

Professional Credit Collections, Inc. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1997No. 85241PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

We are asked to decide if, after a defendant’s success in vacating a default judgment against her, the plaintiff may — by voluntarily dismissing her as a party defendant in the action on an open account — avoid liability for her pre-dismissal attorney’s fees. We answer in the negative.

Professional Credit Collections, Inc. (PCC), as collection agent for a dentist, sued a formerly-married couple (David and Debbie Smith) to recover on an open account. When neither could be served personally, PCC resorted to service by publication and secured a default judgment. Mrs. Smith’s wages…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Parker v. MatthewsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
  3. Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Thayer v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Payne v. DewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Hastings v. KelleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. Batman v. Metro Petroleum, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. AUSTIN PLACE, L.L.C. v. MARTSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API