Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Merchant & Evans Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1929No. Appeal, 324PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The City of Philadelphia brought suit to recover from a landowner the amount of a judgment it was required to pay because of an injury occasioned by a defect in the pavement along the owner’s property. Liability was predicated solely on ownership and control of the premises.

The property, of which the premises in question were a part, was conveyed to defendant, subject to a lease which provided as follows: “Lessor doth hereby demise and let unto lessee, all that certain brick building...... designated on plan hereto attached by the letter £B’ together with the use…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Landell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Lohr v. Philipsburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Dutton v. Lansdowne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Schott v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Wolk v. Pittsburgh Hotels Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brown v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Goodman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Downes v. HODINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Schaefer v. LenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API