Legal Opinion

Estate of O'Connor

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 9395PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Mary Esther O’Connor died testate in the county of Los Angeles. Her will, including a codicil, was admitted to probate. Both in the will and codicil Lucy J. Hartman, a sister of the decedent, was made residuary legatee. In the codicil Charles F. Bailey, the respondent herein, was devised a lot at the corner of Figueroa and Sixty-seventh Streets, in the city of Los Angeles, and he was also made sole executor without bond. Certain property belonging to the estate and located at Los Nietos had been appraised at $15,000, based to a large extent on its probable oil and gas indications. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Christal v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Commercial Bank of San Luis Obispo v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Warner Bros. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pitcher v. LampmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Spencer v. PringleWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Allen v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Estate of SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API