In Re Berkhimer
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam 1
AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2003, based upon the Conclusions of Law, it is hereby ORDERED:
That, pursuant to C.J.D.R.P. No. 503, the attached Opinion with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law be and it is hereby filed, and shall be served on the Judicial Conduct Board and upon the Respondent,
That, either party may file written objections to the Court’s Conclusions of Law within ten (10) days of this Order. Said objections shall include the basis therefor and shall be served on the opposing party,
That, in the event that such objections are filed, the Court shall determine whether to…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re SmithCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1996
- In Re TrkulaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Ciamaichelo v. Independence Blue CrossCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
4Cited by6 opinions
- In Re BerryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In re BrunoCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re CioppaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2012
- In Re BerkhimerCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re BerryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.