Legal Opinion

In Re Berkhimer

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 2003No. 1 JD 03PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam 1

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2003, based upon the Conclusions of Law, it is hereby ORDERED:

That, pursuant to C.J.D.R.P. No. 503, the attached Opinion with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law be and it is hereby filed, and shall be served on the Judicial Conduct Board and upon the Respondent,

That, either party may file written objections to the Court’s Conclusions of Law within ten (10) days of this Order. Said objections shall include the basis therefor and shall be served on the opposing party,

That, in the event that such objections are filed, the Court shall determine whether to…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re SmithCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. In Re TrkulaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Ciamaichelo v. Independence Blue CrossCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re BerryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In re BrunoCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. In re CioppaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. In Re BerkhimerCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. In Re BerryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API