In Re Smith
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
McCLOSKEY, Judge.
Findings of Fact
In accordance with Court of Judicial Discipline Rule of Procedure 502(D)(1), the Judicial Conduct Board and the Respondent have submitted stipulations of fact in lieu of trial. Under Rule 502(D)(1) the Court must accept the following facts as the facts necessary for disposition of this case, and hereby incorporates and adopts the stipulated facts below:
1. The Judicial Conduct Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) is empowered by Art. V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to file formal charges alleging ethical…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Waters v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Jaindl v. MohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In Re CicchettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re TrkulaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re JoyceCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1998
- In Re BerryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re StrockCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.