State v. Chapa
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Gilbert Chapa appeals from his conviction for rape, I.C. § 18-6101(3). Chapa asserts a number of grounds for reversal which can be summarized as follows: (1) the information under which he was convicted failed to properly allege the necessary elements of rape; (2) the district court erred in giving to the jury an accessory liability instruction; (3) the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict; (4) his sentence as compared to that of a co-defendant violates constitutional guarantees of equal protection; and (5) his unified sentence of life…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Uco Oil Company, and Donald SimeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. AyresIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SherrodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. HalbeslebenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. HorejsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. MurrayIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006