Legal Opinion

State v. Halbesleben

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2003No. 27182PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Chief Judge.

August and Jeanine Halbesleben were tried by jury and convicted of felony injury to a child. In this appeal, the Halbeslebens assert, among other things, that the indictment was inadequate to allege an offense and that the jury instructions did not correctly state the law. In light of the Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Young, 138 Idaho 370, 64 P.3d 296 (2002), addressing how the jury must be instructed regarding the mental element in felony injury to child cases, we vacate the conviction and remand for a new trial.

BACKGROUND

The following facts are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MerwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. RobranIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. NathIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. CahoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. MayerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. McNairIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. Cuevas-HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. SohmIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API