Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 2006No. 32394PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

After a bench trial in the magistrate division, Blaine Murray was convicted of a misdemeanor for traveling on a road that had been closed by the Forest Service. He appealed, asserting that he had been deprived of due process because the charging citation did not adequately identify the offense with which Murray was charged. The district court reversed the conviction on due process grounds and dismissed the case. The State now appeals from the district court’s decision. We affirm the district court’s dismissal order, but on the separate basis that the citation failed to charge…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. KavajeczIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. GradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Idaho v. Robert AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. KagariceIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. Stewart-MeyersIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API