Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oliver Cadillac Co. v. Christopher

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 27, 1927PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

For a concise statement of the general nature of this action, its objective and the parties thereto, we quote from appellants' brief:

"This is a proceeding in mandamus, brought by the State at the relation of the Oliver Cadillac Company, a corporation, against the appellants, as Building Commissioner and Director of Public Safety, respectively, of the city of St. Louis, to require them to issue the Oliver Cadillac Company a permit for the erection on a lot at the southwest corner of Lindell Boulevard and Sarah Street, in St. Louis, of a two-story, reinforced-concrete, brick-and-stone building,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Anderson v. JesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Connor v. City of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API