Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. United States Operating Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1915No. Nos. 19,115-(58)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Action in the distinct court for Houston county to recover $2,625 for false representations in the sale of defendant’s stock.

Read the full summary

Action in the distinct court for Houston county to recover $2,625 for false representations in the sale of defendant’s stock. Defendant appeared specially and moved to set aside the service of the summons and to dismiss the action on the ground that defendant was a foreign corporation, that the person on whom the summons was served was in fact only nominally an officer of the corporation and transacted no business for the corporation, and that the corporation did no business in the state. The motion was heard before Kingsley, J., who denied it. Plaintiff’s motion for an order striking out the…

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Defendant is incorporated in Maine. Its place of business is in Chicago, Illinois. Its president resides at Minneapolis, Minnesota. Its business is the handling of the agency business of a life insurance company which does no business in Minnesota. This action is brought to recover the price paid for stock of defendant company alleged to have been sold by defendant to plaintiff, the sale having been rescinded by plaintiff for fraudulent representations made by the agent negotiating the sale. Summons was served on the president in this state. Defendant moved to set aside the service of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  2. State v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  3. Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MeredithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Knapp v. Bullock Tractor Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API