Legal Opinion
Park & Recreation Board of Minneapolis v. Carl Bolander & Sons Property
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 28, 1989No. C9-89-25PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS'
Appellants, Carl Bolander & Sons, et al. (Bolander) owned real estate known as Boom Island, a 24-acre tract next to Nicol-let Island near downtown Minneapolis. The city commenced eminent domain proceedings in 1981. By order issued May 4, 1981 the trial court found the city had the power and authority to condemn the property and that Bolander was not entitled to compensation for the going concern value of its business. (Bolander operated a demolition, excavating, and rock crushing operation on Boom Island and argued that maintaining close…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- County of Blue Earth v. StauffenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State, by Head v. SavageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. City of ShorewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- County of Stearns v. VollerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Port Auth. of City of St. Paul v. EnglundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- City of Eagan v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989