Port Auth. of City of St. Paul v. Englund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant St. Paul Port Authority challenges the jury’s award for condemned property, alleging that it is excessive, that the “development cost” real estate valua*747tion method is inapplicable to this case, and that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence under that theory. We affirm.
FACTS
During the spring of 1985 officers of respondent CSM Corporation and Knox Lumber Company discussed business ventures, including Knox’s plan to relocate one of its stores from one location in St. Paul’s Midway to another. Respondent learned of the U.S. Steel Midway warehouse property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- United States v. 100 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- County of Ramsey v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- United States v. 147.47 Acres of Land in Monroe Cty., Pa.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Buzick v. City of BlaineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993