County of Stearns v. Voller
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge. **
Appellant argues that the district court erred when it applied an “absolute necessity” standard to its petition to condemn land for the purpose of reconstructing of a county highway. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant County of Stearns is seeking to reconstruct a nine-mile portion of County Road 18 that extends from Padua to the road’s intersection with State Highway 28. The county’s efforts began in 1991, when it first proposed reconstructing and widening County Road 18 to be consistent with state aid standards. The proposed project caused considerable controversy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Old Dominion Land Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- City of Duluth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gary N. Porter and Lori Porter v. Richard L. Harden and Janice HardenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CO. v. FOSTER OK RESOURCES LPSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020