Legal Opinion

State v. . Kelly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1923PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRksoN, J.

“When, on the trial of any criminal action in the Superior Court, or in any criminal court, the State has produced its evidence and rested its case, the defendant may move to dismiss the action or for judgment of nonsuit. If the motion is allowed, judgment shall be entered accordingly; and such judgment shall have the. force and effect of a verdict of ‘not guilty’ as to such defendant. If the motion is refused, the defendant may except; and if the defendant introduces no evidence, the case shall be submitted to the jury as in other cases, and the defendant shall have the benefit of his…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. Perkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Brown v. Road CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Mills v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Armstrong v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. State v. . SharpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hinton v. . State TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Groves v. . BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Gallimore v. Town of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Reed v. Howerton Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Sams v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API