Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Mixon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 8, 1917PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court. ’ Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce. Statutory ejectment by Travis Mixon against Thad B. Pennington. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, J.(1) Mixon sued Pennington in statutory ejectment to recover a plat of land lying between their respective larger, uncontested holdings. Over the objection of the defendant (appellant), and after evidence taken and after arguments made, the court suspended the trial and permitted the plaintiff to add count 2 to the complaint, wherein a different description (from that appearing in the original count) of the land sued for was introduced into the pleading, and thereupon allowed further testimony to be taken. There can be no question of the right of the court to exercise and to give…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Torrey v. ForbesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Irwin v. EversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Wade v. GilmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Deal v. HubertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Forrester v. McFrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Alverson v. FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Millican v. MintzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API