Deal v. Hubert
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
Plaintiff’s witness Bishop testified that he was a civil engineer and the county surveyor, and that he had surveyed the lands and lines in controversy, and made a substantially correct map thereof. He was properly allowed to state that the map “showed his survey.”
Referring to a blazed piece of timber produced in court, and shown to have been taken from the line of survey, the witness was allowed to say: “There were some little rises on each side there, which forced me to the conclusion I ought to find something.” The witness was basing his survey on the “field notes” and the marks or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. SeabornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Pennington v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- May v. WillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mahone v. Birmingham Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Pounders v. NixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. ScrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- In Re MessengerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.