Legal Opinion

Deal v. Hubert

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 18, 1923No. 4 Div. 949PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Plaintiff’s witness Bishop testified that he was a civil engineer and the county surveyor, and that he had surveyed the lands and lines in controversy, and made a substantially correct map thereof. He was properly allowed to state that the map “showed his survey.”

Referring to a blazed piece of timber produced in court, and shown to have been taken from the line of survey, the witness was allowed to say: “There were some little rises on each side there, which forced me to the conclusion I ought to find something.” The witness was basing his survey on the “field notes” and the marks or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. SeabornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Pennington v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. May v. WillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mahone v. Birmingham Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Pounders v. NixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. ScrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. In Re MessengerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API