Alverson v. Floyd

The controversy in this case results from a disputed land line extending through Ragland, in St. Clair county. The line in dispute is in the center of section 7, township 15, range 5, extending east and west through the section. Appellee claims that the lot sued for is north of said line, and appellants claim it is south of it. The bill of ex ceptions states that it is agreed that appellee has title of the S. E. 14 of N. E. 14 of section 7 (north of said line), and that appellants have the title of N. E. 14 of S. E. 14 of section 7 (south of the line). The complaint describes the lot sued for…