Legal Opinion

Person v. . Tyson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

Tbe plaintiff brought this action against the defendants to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been sustained through the negligent operation of a taxicab by the defendant Hubert D. Tyson, occurring a short distance outside of the corporate limits of the city of Rocky Mount. The defendant, American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc., demurred to the complaint as not stating a cause of action, for that on the face of the complaint the alleged injury occurred outside the corporate limits of the city of Rocky Mount, and the insurance policy, out of which liability of defendant is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCain v. Hartford Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Interstate Casualty Co. of Birmingham v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Norris v. China Traders' InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Lummus v. Firemen's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Youngquist v. L. J. Droese Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Tennessee Auto Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wright v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Dunn v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Johnson v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Ray v. Hospital Care Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API