Legal Opinion

United States v. James C. Coutchavlis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2001No. 00-10349PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

James C. Coutchavlis appeals from a conviction for disorderly conduct, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 2.34(a)(2), for which he was- ordered to pay a fíne of $100 and serve one year of probation. His primary challenge relates to interpretation of the regulation, which defines disorderly conduct as undertaking certain acts “with intent to cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy or violence,” 36 C.F.R. § 2.34(a), and to the sufficiency of the evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and we affirm.

Background

Coutchavlis was a bartender at the Ah-wahnee Hotel…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. United States v. BrobstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API