Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1944No. S. F. No. 16874PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The Industrial Accident Commission made an award of increased compensation to the dependents of *661Charles W. Brinkley for his death on the ground that it was caused by the serious and wilful 3nisconduct of Bri3ikley,s employer, Bethlehem Steel Company, a corporation. The death occurred during and arose out of the course of Brinkley’s employment. The emplóyer now petitions to have the award annulled.

The Industrial Accident Commission found that petitioner was guilty of serious and wilful misconduct through its executive, managing officers and general superintendents, in that it had knowingly and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Parkhurst v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Blue Diamond Plaster Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hatheway v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Robbins v. Yellow Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Simmons Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission & TringaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Bechtel McCone Parsons Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API