Parkhurst v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Respondent Industrial Accident Commission awarded the petitioner compensation for injuries received in the course of his employment but denied an additional award claimed by reason of the alleged serious and willful misconduct of the employer. The sole issue in this proceeding is whether the commission’s order that petitioner's injury was not caused by the serious and willful misconduct of the employer finds support in the record.
Between June 9, 1938, and September 15, 1938, petitioner was employed as a journeyman ironworker by the J. Phillip Murphy Corporation, which was engaged as a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Ramos v. County of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Breceda v. GamsbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.