Legal Opinion

Bechtel McCone Parsons Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1944No. L. A. 19075PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Petitioner seeks review and annulment of an award of respondent Industrial Accident Commission. Respondent Ira L. Fulmer, an employee of petitioner corporation, sustained an injury arising out of and occurring in the course of his employment. He claimed increased compensation under section 4553 of the Labor Code, which provides that “The amount of compensation otherwise recoverable shall be increased one-half where the employee is injured by reason of the serious and wilful misconduct of any of the following: ...(c) If the employer is a corporation, on the part of an executive, managing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Gordon v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. California Shipbuilding Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. General Petroleum Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. California Shipbuilding Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. California Shipbuilding Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Vega Aircraft v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Simmons Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission & TringaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API