Legal Opinion

Simmons Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission & Tringale

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1945No. Civ. 12923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This cause is presented as a petition to review the findings and an award of the Industrial Accident Commission based upon the alleged “serious and wilful misconduct of the employer” wherein it was held that the injury to the applicant for industrial compensation resulted from the failure “to have in place a guard upon the machine upon which applicant was hurt at or near the point where she was required to handle its operation.” In addition to normal compensation an award of 50 per cent was imposed on the employer.

On or about July 14, 1944, Doris Tringale filed an application for adjustment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Winthrop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Thoreau v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Parkhurst v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Jordan v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Insurance of North America v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API