McKay Machine Co. v. Rodman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The issue presented by this appeal concerns the admissibility of certain expert opinion testimony. At the trial, the evidence showed that defendant ordered from plaintiff a resistance, multiple, spot welder. The order was accepted and filled by plaintiff. Defendant, however, refused to pay the balance due, alleging that the welder did not perform in accordance with the following proviso which he typed upon the purchase order:
“Note: The above machine is to produce a satisfactory and approved weld on either 14 ga. and/or 18 ga. tub with a 19 ga. laminate.”
The meaning of this proviso and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by100 opinions
- Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State Auto Mutual Ins. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.