Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 8, 1943No. 570PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Harry Cunningham, has brought an action against the defendant, Weyerhaeuser Timber Company, a corporation, and seeks recovery for compensation for hours worked in excess of the maximum, liquidated damages and attorney’s fees, under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219.
This action was filed on September 15, 1943. The complaint alleges the period of employment as being from the 15th day of September, 1940, to and inclusive of the 29th day of August, 1941.
The defendant, Weyerhaeuser Timber Company, has filed a motion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Smith v. Continental Oil Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1945
- Butterfield v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.