Scott v. Sopris Imports Ltd.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant, E. and H., Inc. d/b/a Canyon Honda (Canyon), moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims for discrimination and harassment under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII) and for negligent hiring/supervision. The motion is fully briefed and oral argument would not materially aid me in deciding it. For the following reasons, I will grant Canyon’s motion.
I
The following facts are undisputed or, if disputed, are viewed most favorably for plaintiff. Plaintiff began working as a salesperson for Sopris Imports Limited d/b/a So-pris Honda…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Carmela Mares v. Conagra Poultry Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gamez v. Country Cottage Care & Rehab.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Decius v. ACTION COLLECTION SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- Jackson v. Lockie Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Walker v. Faith Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. 786 South LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.