Legal Opinion

Scott v. Sopris Imports Ltd.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided May 7, 1997No. Civil Action No 95-B-2674PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendant, E. and H., Inc. d/b/a Canyon Honda (Canyon), moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims for discrimination and harassment under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII) and for negligent hiring/supervision. The motion is fully briefed and oral argument would not materially aid me in deciding it. For the following reasons, I will grant Canyon’s motion.

I

The following facts are undisputed or, if disputed, are viewed most favorably for plaintiff. Plaintiff began working as a salesperson for Sopris Imports Limited d/b/a So-pris Honda…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Carmela Mares v. Conagra Poultry Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gamez v. Country Cottage Care & Rehab.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
  2. Decius v. ACTION COLLECTION SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  3. Jackson v. Lockie Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
  4. Walker v. Faith Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. 786 South LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API