Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Lockie Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 25, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-D-575PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
The sole remaining defendant, Port Rush, Inc. (“Port Rush”), has filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on the plaintiff’s claims of discrimination and retaliation under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2 and 3 (Title VII). The motion is fully briefed, and I held oral argument on August 8, 2000. The Amended Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 1
I
The following facts are undisputed or, if disputed, are viewed most favorably for the plaintiff:
The plaintiff was employed as a nurse by Firstat Nursing Services. Complaint, ¶¶ 9.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Carmela Mares v. Conagra Poultry Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gamez v. Country Cottage Care & Rehab.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Decius v. ACTION COLLECTION SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- Walker v. Faith Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mile Hi Foods, Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Roark-Whitten Hospitality 2, LPDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.