United States v. Santiago
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LEO, Chief Judge:
This case is before us as an interlocutory appeal by the Government, filed pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 and Rule for Courts-Martial 908, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2000 ed.). Initially, we must determine whether the Government provided timely notice of its intent to appeal the military judge’s ruling on the appellate issues presently before us.1 After reviewing the *611record, we conclude that the issues now before us were addressed in earlier rulings of the military judge, that the Government failed to pursue a timely…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Charles Thomas Dickerson, Washington Legal Foundation Safe Streets Coalition, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Al-NashiriUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2014
- United States v. Specialist BENJAMIN C. HILLArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
- United States v. KhadrUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2008