Legal Opinion
Lonnon v. Batchman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided June 8, 1918No. 21,608PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Barton district court; Daniel A. Banta, judge..
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
The appellant brought suit against the appelleeson a promissory note which was drawn in the following form:
“$2,637.00. _ Jan. 29th, 1913.
“One year after date we promise to pay to the order of James Lonnon twenty-six hundred, thirty-seven & no/i(><> dollars, for value received, *267negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount and with interest from date at the rate of eight percent per annum.
F. N. Batchman, W. L. Hiss, G. W. Hart, H. N. McGill, Lead & Zinc Co.” Wm. Gagleman, ^
The answer denied that the parties executed the note…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Western Grocer Co. v. LackmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Kline v. Bank of TescottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Benham v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- State Bank v. JeltzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rosedale State Bank & Trust Co. v. StringerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Peoples State Bank v. Hoisington Cooperative Mercantile Manufacturing Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Spire v. SpireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Macksville State Bank v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Conqueror Trust Co. v. DanforthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.