Carter v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Ford district court; Littleton M. Day, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action was one to recover on a promissory note. The answer was that the note was given on condition, and the condition had not been performed. Judgment was rendered for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.
George Wilson obtained from the plaintiff a loan of money, giving therefor his promissory note, secured by chattel mortgage on a threshing engine. When Wilson applied for the loan the plaintiff expressed dissatisfaction with the security offered. The defendant gave his opinion of the value of the engine, and agreed to sign the note…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Freeto v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Wilson v. National Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Winfrey v. Galena Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- United States v. Spotless Dollar Cleaners, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.