Legal Opinion
Sterling Construction Company v. Humboldt National Bank and W. H. Cannon
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1965No. 7934_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellees, W. H. Cannon and Humboldt National Bank, brought this action in the lower court against appellant, Sterling Construction Company, to recover damages for the alleged breach of contract.
The basic facts, which are not in dispute, are as follows:
In April, 1960, Sterling entered into a contract with Montana-Dakota Utilities Company, agreeing to lay certain pipelines. Thereafter, Sterling subcontracted a portion of the work to C. M. Vaughan, acting on behalf of a corporation to be formed and known as Three D Pipe Coating Company. In pertinent part this contract…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Troy Bank v. G. A. Whitehead & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Aetna Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Blitz ex rel. Erickson v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Woerter v. OrrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- State Investment Co. v. Cimarron Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Potrero Hill Community Action Committee, Etc. v. The Housing Authority of the City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Riddle v. Dean MacHinery Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Snodgrass & Sons Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Neville v. Delta InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968