Legal Opinion

Peabody Seating Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1962No. Civ. 26305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

American Seating Company (hereinafter referred to as American) instituted a declaratory relief action naming as defendants the City of Long Beach (hereinafter referred to as City); Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. (hereinafter referred to as Newberg); Stanley Mattox, individually and doing business as Gymnastic Supply Company, and Gymnastic Supply Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Gymnastic). The action involves a determination of the rights, duties and obligations of the parties in connection with the installation of stadium seats in a convention and exhibit hall…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holtzendorff v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. City of San Joaquin v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Slaughter v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Johnson v. ThreatsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Covarrubias v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API