Legal Opinion

Heverly v. Kirkendall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1970PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff buyers brought this suit to rescind an earnest money agreement upon the ground that the sellers misrepresented the boundaries of the property purchased. The trial court decreed rescission and the defendant sellers appeal.

A garage was located upon the northwest portion of the property. West of the garage was a gravel roadway whose irregular edge was from two to four feet west of the west edge of the garage. Four feet of the west side of the garage was located upon land owned by the city of Creswell. Defendants were aware of this encroachment. The evidence is conflicting whether…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kraxberger v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Johnson v. CoferOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Woldow v. DeverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Dreifus Lumber Co. v. WernerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. O'Shea v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Millikin v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Farmers & Merchants State Bank, an Idaho Banking Corporation v. Western Bank, an Oregon Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Pierre Arboireau and Sandrine Arboireau v. Adidas-Salomon Ag, a Foreign Corporation and Adidas America, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API