Legal Opinion
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division v. 1-Speedmaster S/N 00218
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 27, 2011No. 4834PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) appeals the circuit court’s affirmance of the magistrate’s order finding a Speedmaster machine confiscated from a convenience store was not an illegal gaming device pursuant to section 12-21-2710 of the South Carolina Code (2000). We affirm.
FACTS
The Speedmaster machine that is the subject of this action was seized by SLED agents from the Cherokee Food Mart on February 13, 2007, for being an illegal gaming device. SLED took the Speedmaster to Cherokee County’s chief magistrate, who issued an Order of Destruction/Notice of Post-Seizure Hearing.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Hill v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- City of Rock Hill v. SuchenskiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jimmy Martin v. Reginald LloydCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- UNION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE v. HendersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- In Re HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- 1 Dragon's Ascent Video Gaming Machine v. SLEDCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025