Legal Opinion

In Re Holmes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 25, 2012No. 2012-01-25-01PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On December 27, 2011, respondent was arrested and charged with possession with intent to distribute heroin. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent opposes the petition. The petition is granted.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby enjoined from access to any trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division v. 1-Speedmaster S/N 00218Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. In Re FordhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API