Legal Opinion

City of Rock Hill v. Suchenski

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 18, 2007No. 26345PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*14Acting Justice MANNING:

This is an appeal from the Rock Hill municipal court. Cynthia Suchenski (respondent) was found guilty of driving with an unlawful alcohol concentration (DUAC), and the circuit court reversed her conviction based on the City of Rock Hill’s (City’s) failure to comply with S.C.Code Ann. § 56-5-2958 (2006), which requires the arresting officer to provide videotaping of the incident site. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent was arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) and was later charged with DUAC. At the incident site, the arresting officer did not videotape the entire arrest…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LandisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. CutterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. HuntleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. MabeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Hill v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. ElwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API